Research methodology in educational inquiry: A critical analysis of its core rudiments
PDF

Keywords

Research methodology
educational research
research design
research ethics

How to Cite

Ify Nwiwu, & Savanhu, J. (2026). Research methodology in educational inquiry: A critical analysis of its core rudiments. Frontiers in Research, 6(5), 339–353. https://doi.org/10.71350/30624533152

Abstract

This paper critically reviews the basic components of research methodology and its role in developing credible educational and social-scientific investigation. It examines the linkage between research problems, philosophical assumptions, design decisions, and constraints by employing a critical narrative review and conceptual synthesis of existing methodological literature. It discusses the quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods designs along with positivism, interpretivism, critical realism, and pragmatism. It also considers the selection of study contexts and populations, as well as inclusion/exclusion criteria, sampling frames, sampling techniques, and decisions about sample size. Additionally, it encompasses sources of data, instrument development, pre-testing and piloting, recruitment, operationalisation, data management, and quality control. It is guided by descriptive and inferential statistics, qualitative thematic and grounded-theory analysis, integration of both types of methods, and suitable software. Ethical requirements such as institutional approval, informed consent, confidentiality, data protection and participant welfare are considered integral and not procedural issues. This analysis reveals that methodological quality is not a function of any one preferred methodology; rather, it is a reflection of the clarity of the relationship between the research questions, assumptions, evidence, analysis, and claims. It finds that reflexive justification, technical expertise and ethical accountability are all necessary to produce rigorous, transferable and socially relevant knowledge, but that methodological checklists alone are not enough in a wide variety of research scenarios in different disciplines, research institutions, research participant groups and evolving policy environments.

https://doi.org/10.71350/30624533152
PDF

References

Asenahabi, B. M. (2019). Basics of research design: A guide to selecting appropriate research design. International Journal of Contemporary Applied Researches, 6(5), 76–89.

Biddix, J. P. (2018). Research methods and applications for student affairs. John Wiley & Sons.

Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Chivanga, S. Y., & Monyai, P. B. (2021). Back to basics: Qualitative research methodology for beginners. Journal of Critical Reviews, 8(2), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.31838/jcr.08.02.03

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Leavy, P. (2022). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, arts-based, and community-based participatory research approaches. Guilford Press.

Liu, Y. (2022). Paradigmatic compatibility matters: A critical review of the qualitative–quantitative debate in mixed methods research. SAGE Open, 12(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221079922

Mertens, D. M. (2014). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Mruck, K., & Mey, G. (2019). Grounded theory methodology and self-reflexivity in the qualitative research process. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of current developments in grounded theory (pp. 470–496). SAGE Publications.

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Reio, T. G., Jr. (2021). The ten research questions: An analytic tool for critiquing empirical studies and teaching research rigor. Human Resource Development Review, 20(3), 374–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843211025182

Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students (8th ed.). Pearson.

Symon, G., Cassell, C., & Johnson, P. (2018). Evaluative practices in qualitative management research: A critical review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(1), 134–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12120

Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2010). SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Tobi, H., & Kampen, J. K. (2018). Research design: The methodology for interdisciplinary research framework. Quality & Quantity, 52(3), 1209–1225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0513-8

Wadsworth, Y. (2020). Do it yourself social research: The bestselling practical guide to doing social research projects. Routledge.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Ify Nwiwu; Juliet Savanhu

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.