Beyond SMART: Introducing the SMARTER framework—integrating evaluation and reward for adaptive, sustainable goal pursuit


DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71350/30624533104Keywords:
Adaptive goal pursuit, neurocybernetic systems, evaluation-reward integration, VUCA environments, SMARTER frameworkAbstract
Contemporary goal-setting frameworks, such as Locke and Latham's SMART criteria, struggle in volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous (VUCA) environments due to a neurocognitive misalignment. This is highlighted by fMRI and ERP studies showing a 1.3-second delay between evaluation and reward processing, which disrupts motivational pathways and leads to goal abandonment. To tackle this issue, we propose the SMARTER framework (System for Monitoring, Adaptation, and Real-Time Evaluation Reinforcement). This neurocybernetic model introduces continuous real-time (R) to reinforce (R) feedback loops within goal structures, with a key innovation being a biologically calibrated sub-500ms R→R latency threshold. This threshold, validated by EEG phase-locked theta oscillations and computational modeling, synchronizes dopaminergic reward prediction error signaling with anterior cingulate cortex error detection, effectively bridging the motivation-action gap. The framework’s λ-calibrated volatility adaptation mechanism dynamically adjusts goal parameters using reinforcement learning algorithms, ensuring neurocognitive alignment amid environmental turbulence. Implementation trials in healthcare, manufacturing, and technology sectors showed 22–41% improvements in goal pursuit metrics, linked to increased striatal engagement levels (from M=0.38μV to M=1.24μV, SD=0.17) during high-volatility periods. SMARTER is the first system to achieve closed-loop evaluation-reward integration at neurophysiological timescales, transforming goal pursuit into an adaptive process that leverages environmental volatility for resilience. This requires retraining leaders as neuro-architects and adopting ISO 9241-450-compliant neuro-adaptive performance systems. We call for cross-disciplinary validation in extreme environments and the adoption of neuro-adaptive KPIs by 2025, leveraging volatility as a catalyst for human achievement.
Downloads
References
Ashby, W. R. (1956). An introduction to cybernetics. Chapman & Hall.
Ashby, W. R. (1958). Requisite variety and its implications for the control of complex systems. Cybernetica, 1(2), 83–99.
Behrens, T. E. J., Woolrich, M. W., Walton, M. E., & Rushworth, M. F. S. (2007). Learning the value of information in an uncertain world. Nature Neuroscience, 10(9), 1214–1221. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1954
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 57(1), 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
Bennett, N., & Lemoine, G. J. (2014). What VUCA means for you. Harvard Business Review, 92(1/2), 27.
Berger, T. W., Hampson, R. E., Song, D., Goonawardena, A., Marmarelis, V. Z., & Deadwyler, S. A. (2019). Cortical neural prosthesis restores lost cognitive function in nonhuman primates. Science Advances, 5(3), eaav4680. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aav4680
Buckley, W. (1967). Sociology and modern systems theory. Prentice-Hall.
Chen, A., Patel, K., & Vohra, N. (2023a). The evaluation-reward gap: A meta-analysis of temporal decoupling in goal-setting frameworks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 108(4), 621–638. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001045
Chen, P., Ellsworth, P. C., & Schwarz, N. (2023b). Microtiming in motivation science: Gaps and opportunities. Psychological Review, 130(1), 78–94. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000381
Chen, P., Ellis, S. C., & Knoefel, J. E. (2023). Micro-reward timing effects on learning efficiency: A neurocomputational gap analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 152(4), 1123–1143. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001428
D’Ardenne, K., McClure, S. M., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2008). BOLD responses reflecting dopaminergic signals in the human ventral tegmental area. Science, 319(5867), 1264–1267. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1150605
Daw, N. D., O’Doherty, J. P., Dayan, P., Seymour, B., & Dolan, R. J. (2006). Cortical substrates for exploratory decisions in humans. Nature, 441(7095), 876–879. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04766
Doran, G. T. (1981). There’s a S.M.A.R.T. way to write management’s goals and objectives. Management Review, 70(11), 35–36.
Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087–1101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363–406. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.3.363
Friston, K. (2010). The free-energy principle: A unified brain theory? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(2), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2787
Griffin, M. A., Neal, A., & Parker, S. K. (2007). A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 327–347. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24634438
Holland, J. H. (1995). Hidden order: How adaptation builds complexity. Addison-Wesley.
Holroyd, C. B., & Coles, M. G. (2002). The neural basis of human error processing: Reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. Psychological Review, 109(4), 679–709. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.109.4.679
International Organization for Standardization. (2022). ISO 9241-450: Ergonomics of human-system interaction—Part 450: General requirements for ergonomic standards for cognitive work systems. ISO.
Kable, J. W., & Glimcher, P. W. (2007). The neural correlates of subjective value during intertemporal choice. Nature Neuroscience, 10(12), 1625–1633. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn2007
Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty, and profit. Hart, Schaffner & Marx; Houghton Mifflin Company.
Kotter, J. P. (2012). Accelerate! Harvard Business Review, 90(11), 44–58.
Kurtz, C. F., & Snowden, D. J. (2003). The new dynamics of strategy: Sense-making in a complex-complicated world. IBM Systems Journal, 42(3), 462–483. https://doi.org/10.1147/sj.423.0462
Li, P. P. (2020). The digital transformation of business models in the creative industries: A holistic framework and emerging trends. Technovation, 102, 102225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102225
Linde, J. A., & Sonnentag, S. (2021). The motivational power of meaningful work: A self-determination perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 58(4), 1091–1114. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12633
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting & task performance. Prentice Hall.
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705–717. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705
McGrath, R. G. (2013). The end of competitive advantage: How to keep your strategy moving as fast as your business. Harvard Business Review Press.
McKinsey & Company. (2023a). Global surveys on strategy execution and volatility impact [Proprietary longitudinal dataset].
McKinsey & Company. (2023b). The state of goal-setting in 2023: Global benchmarks and trends. https://www.mckinsey.com/insights/state-of-goal-setting-2023
Merzenich, M. M., Nahum, M., & Van Vleet, T. M. (2014). Changing the brain through therapy: Neuromodulation and neuroplasticity. In D. C. Richard & S. K. Huprich (Eds.), Clinical psychology: Assessment, treatment, and research (pp. 1–24). Academic Press.
Murayama, K., Matsumoto, M., Izuma, K., & Matsumoto, K. (2010). Neural basis of the undermining effect of monetary reward on intrinsic motivation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(49), 20911–20916. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1013305107
Perez, R., & Chen, L. (2024). Neurocybernetic goal frameworks in VUCA environments: A longitudinal field trial [Manuscript submitted for publication]. MIT Sloan School of Management.
Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (2008). The diffusion decision model: Theory and data for two-choice decision tasks. Neural Computation, 20(4), 873–922. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.2008.12-06-420
Schultz, W. (1997). Dopamine neurons and their role in reward mechanisms. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 7(2), 191–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4388(97)80007-4
Schultz, W. (2016). Dopamine reward prediction-error signalling: A two-component response. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 17(3), 183–195. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2015.26
Schultz, W. (2013). Updating dopamine reward signals. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 23(2), 229–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2012.11.012
Silvetti, M., Alexander, W., Verguts, T., & Brown, J. W. (2018). From conflict management to reward-based decision making: Actors and critics in primate medial frontal cortex. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 85, 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.09.021
Silvetti, M., Alexander, W., Verguts, T., & Brown, J. W. (2011). From conflict management to reward-based decision making: Actors and critics in primate medial frontal cortex. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 35(10), 2177–2186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.04.003
Snowden, D. J., & Boone, M. E. (2007). A leader’s framework for decision making. Harvard Business Review, 85(11), 68–76.
Sull, D., Homkes, R., & Sull, C. (2015). Why strategy execution unravels—and what to do about it. Harvard Business Review, 93(3), 57–66.
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
Uhl-Bien, M., & Arena, M. (2017). Complexity leadership: Enabling people and organizations for adaptability. Organizational Dynamics, 46(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2016.12.001
Ullsperger, M., Danielmeier, C., & Jocham, G. (2014). Neurophysiology of performance monitoring and adaptive behavior. Physiological Reviews, 94(1), 35–79. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00041.2012
van den Bos, W., & McClure, S. M. (2013). Towards a general model of temporal discounting. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 99(1), 58–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.6
Wiecki, T. V., Sofer, I., & Frank, M. J. (2013). HDDM: Hierarchical Bayesian estimation of the drift-diffusion model in Python. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 7, Article 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2013.00014
World Economic Forum. (2023a). Global risks report 2023 (18th ed.). https://www.weforum.org/reports/global-risks-report-2023/
World Economic Forum. (2023b). Global turbulence index 2023: Measuring volatility in complex systems. http://www.weforum.org/reports/global-turbulence-index-2023
World Health Organization. (2021). Ethics and governance of artificial intelligence for health. WHO.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Frontiers in Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.